Record #7795
The Supreme Court will uphold the challenged Idaho and West Virginia laws barring male athletes from girls' and women's sports as constitutionally valid.
CorrectRecorded occurrence
Each quote retains its own speaker, episode, publication date, timestamp when available, and full-source link.
Occurrence 1 of 1 · source record #7795 The Megyn Kelly Show · Massive Day For Women's Sports at SCOTUS, and Remembering Scott Adams, with Kristen Waggoner and Andrew Klavan | Ep. 1229
Original quoteThe court's going to uphold the bans. So I think the 27 states are going to be happy, and I predict, I think it's going to be 6-3, that the High Court will uphold those bans as constitutionally valid.
Quote begins at 03:07
Exact speaking time unavailable; using the official episode publication date.
How the call settles
YES if the Supreme Court's controlling judgments uphold both challenged state bans against the constitutional and Title IX challenges before it; NO if the Court invalidates either ban or rules that either plaintiff must be allowed to compete in girls' or women's sports.
Our reasoning
YES on the research record because On June 30, 2026 the Supreme Court, in the consolidated Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. decision, upheld the Idaho and West Virginia laws barring male athletes from girls' and women's sports (unanimous on the Title IX claim, 6-3 on the equal-protection claim), rejecting the challenges brought against both bans.. Applied stored rule: YES if the Supreme Court's controlling judgments uphold both challenged state bans against the constitutional and Title IX challenges before it; NO if the Court invalidates either ban or rules that either plaintiff must be allowed to compete in girls' or women's sports.
Outcome evidence
On June 30, 2026 the Supreme Court, in the consolidated Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. decision, upheld the Idaho and West Virginia laws barring male athletes from girls' and women's sports (unanimous on the Title IX claim, 6-3 on the equal-protection claim), rejecting the challenges brought against both bans.
Outcome date: 2026-06-30
Verdict recorded: 2026-08-12
Basis: research