Record #4103
In Katie Phang's Epstein Files Transparency Act lawsuit, the Justice Department will argue that the Act provides no private cause of action or remedy
CorrectRecorded occurrence
Each quote retains its own speaker, episode, publication date, timestamp when available, and full-source link.
Occurrence 1 of 1 · source record #4103 MeidasTouch · Trump gets Order he Feared from Meidas Lawsuit against Him!!!
Original quoteWhat we expect the Department of Justice to argue is what they argued when Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey saw it as special master. We believe the Department of Justice is going to say the Epstein Transparency Act provides no cause of action or no remedy and nobody can do anything.
Jump to quote · 09:50
Exact speaking time unavailable; using the official episode publication date.
How the call settles
DOJ's filed opposition brief or its argument at the June 16, 2026 hearing before Judge Emmet Sullivan asserts that the Epstein Files Transparency Act creates no private cause of action or remedy
Our reasoning
YES on the research record because In Phang v. Blanche the Justice Department argued Phang could not sue to compel unredacted release because FOIA was her only available remedy, and after Judge Sullivan's June 25-26, 2026 preliminary injunction DOJ's filings said it 'strongly disagrees' that the Epstein Files Transparency Act is enforceable by private parties through the APA — i.e., the no-private-cause-of-action/no-remedy argument MeidasTouch predic.... Applied stored rule: DOJ's filed opposition brief or its argument at the June 16, 2026 hearing before Judge Emmet Sullivan asserts that the Epstein Files Transparency Act creates no private cause of action or remedy.
Outcome evidence
In Phang v. Blanche the Justice Department argued Phang could not sue to compel unredacted release because FOIA was her only available remedy, and after Judge Sullivan's June 25-26, 2026 preliminary injunction DOJ's filings said it 'strongly disagrees' that the Epstein Files Transparency Act is enforceable by private parties through the APA — i.e., the no-private-cause-of-action/no-remedy argument MeidasTouch predicted.
Outcome date: 2026-06-05
Verdict recorded: 2026-07-30
Basis: research